open search
Allgemein Internationales Arbeitsrecht

What does the new Whistleblower Directive mean for EU employers?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Whistleblower Directive was published on 26 November and Member States now have two years to implement it. This article explains the key provisions of the Directive and what it will mean for employers.

The Directive sets out common standards for protecting individuals who report information on breaches of EU law they acquired in a ‘work-related context’. It protects whistleblowers in both the public and private sectors and covers not only workers, but also job applicants, former employees, shareholders, board members, trainees and the self-employed. Family members, and colleagues of whistleblowers and legal entities connected to them are also protected.

Reporting channels

Internal reporting

The following categories of organisation will have an obligation to establish internal reporting:

  • Legal entities in the private sector with 50 or more workers.
  • All public sector legal entities. Member States can however choose to exempt public sector entities in municipalities with fewer than 10,000 inhabitants or 50 workers, and others with fewer than 50 workers.

Internal reporting must comply with requirements relating to security, confidentiality and impartiality. There are also procedural requirements in the Directive relating to notification, acknowledgement and follow-up of a whistleblowing disclosure.

External reporting

Member States must establish independent and autonomous external reporting channels. These must comply with broadly the same requirements as internal reporting channels.

Protection of whistleblowers

The Directive imposes an obligation to protect whistleblowers against any retaliation, or threatened or attempted retaliation measures. Retaliation includes but is not limited to dismissal, demotion, withholding promotion, transfer of duties, change of place of work, reduced wages, changes in working hours, withholding training, negative performance reviews and disciplinary measures.

Burden of proof

In court or other official proceedings relating to a whistleblowing disclosure, the burden of proof is reversed. This means that if a whistleblower demonstrates that they reported a breach or made a public disclosure and suffered a negative consequence, there will be a presumption that the negative consequence was an act of reprisal. It will be up to the person who took the measure with a negative consequence (i.e. the employer) to demonstrate that it was justified and was not taken in retaliation for the whistleblowing disclosure.


Under the Directive, Member States have an obligation to implement effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties on individuals and legal entities that:

  • hinder or attempt to hinder whistleblowing;
  • retaliate against anyone protected in the Directive;
  • bring legal proceedings against anyone protected in the Directive;
  • breach the duty to keep the identity of whistleblowers confidential;

Anyone who knowingly discloses or publicly reports false information is also subject to these penalties and organisations affected must be able to bring damages actions in relation to false disclosures under national law.

Next steps

Member States now have until 17 December 2021 to implement the Directive into national law. Private sector organisations with between 50 and 249 employees have until 17 December 2023 to implement the obligation to establish reporting channels for whistleblowers.

KLIEMT.Arbeitsrecht is a member of Ius Laboris, an international alliance of leading law firms providing specialised services in employment law.

Ius Laboris

Ius Laboris is a leading international employment law practice combining the world’s leading employment, labour and pension firms. Our role lies in sharing insights and helping clients to navigate the world of labour and employment law successfully.
Verwandte Beiträge
Datenschutz Neueste Beiträge

New year, new mechanism for US-EU data transfers?

Last October, President Joe Biden’s administration published an executive order regarding a new EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework – the replacement of the so-called Privacy Shield mechanism that previously allowed transfers of personal data from the EU to the United States. The executive order immediately sparked the European Commission’s process to assess the new U.S. regime and prepare a respective adequacy decision, which would bring considerable…
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

The EU approves a minimum wage Directive: what does it say?

On 14 September, the European Parliament approved a Directive introducing the principle of a minimum wage in the European Union. What does it say, and will it herald a new era for collective bargaining? Summary On 14 September 2022, the European Parliament voted to approve a Directive on adequate minimum wages in the EU, with 505 votes in favour, 92 against and 44 abstentions. The…
Neueste Beiträge Whistleblowing & Investigations

Bundesregierung beschließt Hinweisgeberschutzgesetz – Was ist neu?

Die Frist zur Umsetzung der EU-Whistleblower-Richtlinie ist bereits am 17. Dezember 2021 abgelaufen. Nach dem obligatorischen „blauen Brief“ aus Brüssel hat die Bundesregierung nunmehr am 27. Juli 2022 einen Gesetzesentwurf beschlossen. Wir geben einen ersten Überblick, welche Neuerungen dieser Entwurf enthält und wann mit seinem Inkrafttreten zu rechnen ist. Zum Hintergrund: Was regelt die EU-Whistleblower-Richtlinie? In der EU-Whistleblower-Richtlinie werden juristische Personen des privaten und öffentlichen Sektors…
Abonnieren Sie den KLIEMT-Newsletter.
Jetzt anmelden und informiert bleiben.

Die Abmeldung ist jederzeit möglich.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert