open search
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge United States

Executive Order combatting discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community: what do US-employers need to know?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Within hours of his inauguration on 20 January 2021, President Biden signed his Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation. The Executive Order establishes the new administration’s policy prohibiting discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation, and directs federal agencies to take affirmative steps to secure these rights.  

The Executive Order commits to enforcing the holding of Bostock v. Clayton County throughout all federal agencies. In Bostock, the Supreme Court of the United States held that Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination ‘because of . . . sex’ covers discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation. After Bostock was decided, several federal agencies, including the United States Department of Education, in interpreting Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, sought to distinguish Title VII in an effort to avoid applying Bostock to certain controversial matters, such as sex-separated bathrooms, locker rooms and athletic teams. Under the prior administration, the Department of Education refused to recognise the applicability of Bostock to such situations.  

Notably, the Executive Order specifically addresses student access to restrooms, locker rooms, and sports, and confirms that the Bostock holding applies to Title IX to prohibit discrimination against transgender individuals in school settings. It also orders the Department of Education to officially reverse these policies impacting the rights of transgender and gender non-conforming students. The Executive Order also explicitly confirms the applicability of Bostock to any other federal law prohibiting sex discrimination, including the Fair Housing Act, s412 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the Affordable Care Act.  

Under this Executive Order, the head of each federal agency is directed to reevaluate their policies relating to sex discrimination, including the agency’s implementing regulations, in light of the Bostock decision, and make changes consistent with the instruction of the Executive Order within 100 days. The head of each agency must develop a plan to implement, revise or rescind its policies to conform to the statutes that prohibit sex discrimination consistent with the Biden administration’s policy set forth in the Executive Order. Bottom line

President Biden’s Executive Order represents a return to Obama-era policies aimed at including LGBTQ+ individuals in anti-discrimination protections. Although Bostock addressed Title VII, the Executive Order directs that holding to apply to all federal laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of ‘sex,’ including Title IX and its implementing regulations related to sex-separated bathrooms, locker rooms and athletic teams. This marks a change for states that have not already passed such laws, and presents an area of potential litigation in more than a dozen states where lawmakers have proposed, or previously passed, legislation restricting participation in athletics and/or gender-confirming health care for transgender minors.  

Employers, public schools, universities, colleges, health insurers, healthcare professionals and landlords, among others subject to federal law, should review their policies and procedures to ensure they are aligned with Bostock and the Executive Order, and take action to address any discrimination or harassment based on sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, and/or transgender status. Employers subject to federal law should also ensure their policies are applied equitably to prevent discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community. 

We anticipate seeing more executive orders addressing equality issues relating to the LGBTQ+ community, including a repeal of the Trump administration’s bar on transgender individuals serving in the U.S. military, which was announced by the White House on Monday 25 January. 

Ius Laboris

Ius Laboris is a leading international employment law practice combining the world’s leading employment, labour and pension firms. Our role lies in sharing insights and helping clients to navigate the world of labour and employment law successfully.
Verwandte Beiträge
Datenschutz Neueste Beiträge

New year, new mechanism for US-EU data transfers?

Last October, President Joe Biden’s administration published an executive order regarding a new EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework – the replacement of the so-called Privacy Shield mechanism that previously allowed transfers of personal data from the EU to the United States. The executive order immediately sparked the European Commission’s process to assess the new U.S. regime and prepare a respective adequacy decision, which would bring considerable…
Arbeitsrecht 4.0 Individualarbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

Wenig Aufwand, hoher Gewinn: AGG-Entschädigung bei Bewerbung über Chatfunktion

Kommt es im Rahmen eines Bewerbungsprozesses zu einer Diskriminierung, sind grundsätzlich Schadensersatz- und Entschädigungsansprüche aus dem AGG möglich. Voraussetzung dafür ist der „Bewerberstatus“. Doch wie wird man eigentlich zum „Bewerber“? Reicht dazu eine einfache Nachricht oder müssen dem (potenziellen) Arbeitgeber auch prüffähige Bewerbungsunterlagen übermittelt werden? Zu dieser Frage entschied das LAG Schleswig-Holstein kürzlich im Fall einer Bewerbung über eBay-Kleinanzeigen. Durch das AGG sollen Beschäftigte im…
Individualarbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge Schwerbehinderung

AGG-Verstoß bei fehlender Zustimmung des Integrationsamtes?

Soll ein schwerbehinderter Arbeitnehmer gekündigt werden, bedarf die Kündigung der Zustimmung des Integrationsamtes. Eine Kündigung ohne Zustimmung ist nichtig. Zusätzlich können auf den Arbeitgeber Entschädigungszahlungen nach dem AGG zukommen. Worauf bei Kündigungen von schwerbehinderten Arbeitnehmern zu achten ist, erläutert dieser Beitrag. Das Bundesarbeitsgericht hatte sich mit der Frage zu beschäftigen, wann eine Schwerbehinderung des Arbeitnehmers „offenkundig“ ist und ob diesem eine Entschädigung nach § 15…
Abonnieren Sie den KLIEMT-Newsletter.
Jetzt anmelden und informiert bleiben.

Die Abmeldung ist jederzeit möglich.