open search
close
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

AI and global mobility practice

The pandemic has driven a paradigm shift in the world of global mobility. The sudden and widespread roll-out of technology to support remote working showed employees new possibilities for ‘working from everywhere’, and has driven demand for new kinds of flexibility that, until recently, could scarcely have been imagined. AI now promises to bring a fresh round of disruption to global mobility practice.

Global mobility is doubtless on the rise. In the constant war for talent, the possibility of ‘working from everywhere’, has taken remote working to the next level. ‘Digital nomads’, ‘satellite employees’, ‘hybrid cross-border workers’, ‘workcations’, and ‘virtual assignments’ are post-pandemic trends that companies need to adapt to in order to attract and retain talent. These trends signal major departures from traditional global mobility models centred on things like postings, salary splits, and transfers.

Moving from working five days per week at the office to ‘working from everywhere’ sounds like a nice idea, but it comes with a number of legal challenges. These include immigration, employment rights, social security cover and contributions, tax, compliance, and data security, with each case potentially involving a unique set of parameters and processes. Different approaches may be required depending on an employee’s nationality, home country and host country, among other considerations. Immigration, compliance, payroll, tax, and contractual requirements will vary between jurisdictions, and there can be difficulties in determining which laws apply. Companies are, at present, struggling to assess these risks and to set the right balance as they define their policies in relation to these new forms of global mobility.

And here is where AI tools may be of assistance. AI has the potential to support global mobility practitioners in their risk assessments and to make processes more efficient. Some repetitive, less interesting and administrative tasks like contract generation or the filling out of applications could be automated, allowing more time for the more strategic and complex aspects of the job.

Drawing on historical data, AI has the potential to anticipate legal and practical challenges and risks in some countries, to identify cross-border successes and failures, to map cross-border gaps, and to project costs. In the war for talent, it also has the potential to offer a more personalised offering tailored to each employee’s individual case and needs when preparing a global mobility assignment.

However, as with any other use of AI in HR, it also gives rise to some concerns. First, there may be concerns around privacy and data security, in particular when processing personal information. An employee’s work permit or visa application can include sensitive medical information and criminal record checks; special care is also required for things like social security and tax status. Further, caution should be taken to ensure that any algorithms used are free from bias and do not amplify existing inequalities.

Finally, each global mobility case is unique, with its own parameters. It may be driven by an employer, for business reasons, or sought by an employee for personal reasons. External circumstances may also play a significant role, as can be seen in times of war or economic crisis. It should not be forgotten that there is always a human aspect and assessment where global mobility is concerned, and that this requires a human assessment that AI tools cannot provide.

Ius Laboris




Ius Laboris is a leading international employment law practice combining the world’s leading employment, labour and pension firms. Our role lies in sharing insights and helping clients to navigate the world of labour and employment law successfully.
Verwandte Beiträge
Compliance Datenschutz Digitalisierung in Unternehmen Geschäftsgeheimnisse Neueste Beiträge

Shadow AI im Unternehmen – Was Arbeitgeber jetzt regeln sollten

Generative KI gehört in den allermeisten Unternehmen zum Alltag. Beschäftigte lassen E-Mails formulieren, Präsentationen strukturieren, Excel-Formeln oder Codes erstellen sowie Texte zusammenfassen. Nicht immer geschieht dies jedoch mit den vom Arbeitgeber freigegebenen Anwendungen. Stattdessen werden häufig private Accounts oder frei zugängliche KI-Systeme genutzt – vielfach ohne Wissen des Arbeitgebers. Dieses Phänomen wird als „Shadow AI“ bezeichnet: die Nutzung von KI-Anwendungen außerhalb der vom Unternehmen vorgesehenen…
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

The EU moves to slim down and delay parts of its AI Act

The European Parliament and Council have agreed to slim down parts of the EU AI Act, delaying high-risk obligations and easing compliance for smaller and mid-sized firms. The proposed amending legislation has been published and is now awaiting adoption. This is expected before August 2026. We explore what the simplification will mean for employers below. ‘Simplification is one of the most difficult things to do,’…
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

Data, privacy and cyber in the UK and EU: Ten watchouts for 2026

In the fast-paced, ever-changing world of data, privacy and cyber, staying ahead of the curve is crucial. With developments in AI, online safety, tracking technologies and international data transfers, organisations in the EU and UK face an increasingly complex landscape. Following Data Protection Day last month, our UK firm has identified ten key themes they believe will significantly impact businesses in the year ahead. 1….
Abonnieren Sie den kostenfreien KLIEMT-Newsletter.
Jetzt anmelden und informiert bleiben.

 

Die Abmeldung ist jederzeit möglich.