open search
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

Employers cannot prevent men having a hairstyle allowed for women

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
The French Court of Cassation has ruled that an airline dress code that allowed women cabin crew members but not men to wear their hair braided is discriminatory.


The Air France cabin crew dress code permitted women who had braided hair to wear it tied up in a chignon. This option was not offered for men, who were required to wear their hair neatly and no longer than collar length.

An Air France steward who had braided hair that he wore tied up in a chignon was disciplined, and ultimately dismissed, for failing to respect the dress code.

The steward believed his dismissal was discriminatory and challenged it, claiming damages. His appeal was rejected by a tribunal, and then by the Court of Appeal, which found that Air France’s brand image required it to have a dress code and that the distinction in the dress code between male and female hairstyles was based on social convention.

The Court of Cassation was then asked to rule on whether a dress code that restricted male employees’ freedom to style their hair was sex discrimination.

The Court of Cassation ruling

The Court stated that the Labour Code only authorises differences in treatment that reflect essential professional requirements. The employer’s objective in imposing them must be legitimate and what is required of employees must be proportionate.

Case law has also established that the demands made of employees must be founded objectively in the employee’s job and not merely reflect the employer’s subjective wishes.

The Court found that only allowing women and not men to have braided hair was a difference in treatment solely based on the employee’s sex. There was no objective reason related to the steward’s job for preventing him from having braids. The Court considered that a hairstyle was not part of Air France staff’s uniform (it did not allow customers to identity members of air crew).

The Court also held that social convention and the common perception of male and female appearance were not an objective and necessary reason related to the steward’s job that could justify treating him differently on the basis of his sex.

As a result, the Court concluded that it was not possible to forbid men from having a hairstyle that was authorised for women.

Ius Laboris

Ius Laboris is a leading international employment law practice combining the world’s leading employment, labour and pension firms. Our role lies in sharing insights and helping clients to navigate the world of labour and employment law successfully.
Verwandte Beiträge
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

Is a ‘neutral’ workplace dress code discriminatory?

The European Court of Justice has ruled that a neutral dress code in the workplace that prevents employees from wearing religious clothing or symbols such as headscarves may not be direct or indirect discrimination on the ground of religion or belief if the employer fulfils a set of conditions. On 13 October, the European Court of Justice ruled, in line with its previous case law,…
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

What are the new green reporting duties in France?

The French Climate Law introduced new environmental reporting obligations for companies. Now, a recent decree has set out details of these obligations. In France, in companies with at least 50 employees, the employer must provide the staff representatives (the ‘Social and Economic Committee’) with an economic and social database, which gathers all the information necessary for the numerous consultations and recurrent information requirements with regard…
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

Paternity leave extended in France: the new rules

From 1 July 2021 the rules for paternity leave in France have changed: new fathers are now entitled to 25 days’ leave. After the birth of a child, the employed father and, if applicable, the mother’s employed spouse or partner or the employee linked to her by a PACS (civil partnership) agreement are entitled to 25 calendar days’ paternity and childcare leave or 32 calendar…
Abonnieren Sie den kostenfreien KLIEMT-Newsletter.
Jetzt anmelden und informiert bleiben.


Die Abmeldung ist jederzeit möglich.