open search
close
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge United Kingdom

COVID-19: what regulatory action are governments taking on pensions in the UK and beyond?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The UK Government and the Pensions Regulator have been very active over the past few months, introducing financial assistance, regulatory flexibilities and guidance aimed at helping employers and pension schemes to deal with the impact of COVID-19. This article provides details, followed by a comparison with other jurisdictions.

Delaying or reducing pension scheme contributions

To try and help employers to ease cash flow problems caused by the pandemic, a more flexible approach towards their obligations to pay into pension schemes is being taken.

DB schemes

For employers with defined benefit (‘DB’) schemes, the Pensions Regulator (‘TPR’) has been sympathetic to requests for suspension or reduction of contributions required to fund those schemes. It released guidance saying that, subject to certain principles, pension scheme trustees should be ‘open to’ such requests. Trustees could allow short-term delays or reductions to help with immediate liquidity constraints, despite having limited information or time to assess the request.

The tone of TPR’s guidance has changed recently reflecting that, following the initial uncertainty at the outset of the crisis, trustees should now have better visibility of an employer’s financial situation. Despite its continuing flexibility, TPR now emphasises the need for trustees to do due diligence, keep a close eye on the employer’s ability to support the scheme, and put suitable protections in place. TPR is also very clear that pension schemes should be treated fairly with other stakeholders. In particular, employers seeking a break from contributions should expect payments to shareholders to stop.

TPR initially allowed a three-month window in which it would not use its regulatory powers in respect of either reporting late payment or failure to make contributions to DB schemes. This expired on 30 June, although TPR will continue to ‘respond pragmatically’ where breaches are COVID-19 related.

DC schemes

There is less flexibility when it comes to suspending or delaying contributions where employers have a defined contribution (‘DC’) scheme. Unlike a DB scheme, the contributions to a DC scheme are allocated directly to the individual employee’s pension savings pot, so any delay would have an impact on those savings. Also, under the UK’s automatic enrolment legislation, both minimum employer and overall pension contributions are required to be paid to a DC scheme. This requirement has not changed during the pandemic. (Whilst this legislation also applies to employers with DB schemes, the focus is on minimum benefits being provided rather than the level of contributions.)

However, for employers paying higher DC contributions than the minimum level required under legislation, TPR has made it easier to reduce contributions down to that level. Where an employer with at least 50 employees is contemplating a reduction in its DC contributions, a 60-day consultation would generally need to be held. TPR has temporarily waived this requirement, subject to certain conditions being met, although it still expects as much consultation as possible to take place. In a further relaxation, trustees and providers now have 150 days to report late payments of DC contributions (normally, this needs to be done within 90 days).

Both of the above easements will remain in place until at least 30 September 2020.

Government funding

The UK Government included a grant for pension contributions in its Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (also known as ‘furlough’). Under this scheme, the Government agreed to pay a portion of wages in respect of employees who temporarily stopped working for their employer as a result of the pandemic, without being made redundant.

The pension contribution part of the grant, which was calculated by reference to minimum automatic enrolment contributions, ceased to apply at the end of July. As things stand, the Government is also reducing the amount of grant available each month, with the scheme currently scheduled to close altogether at the end of October.

Other regulatory easements and guidance

TPR granted a number of other easements to help with administering pension schemes during the turbulence of the early stages of the pandemic. These included promises not to take regulatory action if schemes suspended pension transfers or didn’t meet deadlines for scheme valuations. Most of these easements ended on 30 June 2020.

Both TPR and the Government have released a raft of guidance for employers and schemes on dealing with the crisis, which is being regularly updated in response to developments.

Ius Laboris




Ius Laboris is a leading international employment law practice combining the world’s leading employment, labour and pension firms. Our role lies in sharing insights and helping clients to navigate the world of labour and employment law successfully.
Verwandte Beiträge
Individualarbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

„Corona“ – Neues aus der Rechtsprechung

In den letzten Jahren führte vor allem die SARS-CoV-2 Infektion zu zahlreichen Urteilen in Hinblick auf eine Entgeltfortzahlung, etwa aufgrund einer Betriebsschließung wegen eines Lockdowns (siehe hierzu auch Blogbeitrag vom 18. Oktober 2021). Nun traf das BAG eine Grundsatzentscheidung zur Frage der Entgeltfortzahlung im Krankheitsfall im Zusammenhang mit einer „Corona“ Infektion nach einer unterlassenen Schutzimpfung (vgl. Pressemitteilung vom 20. März 2024). Sachverhalt Der Kläger war…
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

Making mental health a priority in the workplace

In Spain, both employers and public authorities are taking initiatives to improve workers’ mental health. In general, in Spain people have a positive perception of their state of health, both physically and psychologically. In 2020, 75.51% of the population aged 15 and over rated their state of health positively, and this positive perception among Spaniards has remained virtually unchanged over the last 33 years (see here)….
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

World Mental Health Day: what’s changing in the workplace

The World Health Organization has designated 10 September as ‘World Mental Health Day’. Work can be vital for our mental wellbeing, giving purpose and financial stability, but there is also a growing awareness of the dangers of anxiety, depression and burnout in the workplace. How are Mexico and other countries tackling the issue? Fifteen million Mexicans live with employment-related stress, which accounts for three in…
Abonnieren Sie den kostenfreien KLIEMT-Newsletter.
Jetzt anmelden und informiert bleiben.

 

Die Abmeldung ist jederzeit möglich.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert